A/Prof Andrew Brooks
After my first consultation with you, you wrote to my GP, “His urodynamic study indicates the high pressure-low flow rate indicative of bladder outflow obstruction.” “He has quite a marked degree of prostatic hyperplasia at 62 mls.”
Are you yet prepared to release a copy of the “urodynamic study” on which you based these comments? – I note that you haven’t been prepared to do so in the past, despite the many requests sent to you, and despite the fact that I’m entitled to receive one, by law.
It seems to me that it may have been faulty, leading you to make an erroneous diagnosis and a recommendation as to treatment for the “frequency problem” I was experiencing and which I’d been referred to you for help with, and which, when carried out, FAILED COMPLETELY!
A note for readers: Dr Brooks has been advised by an Australia Post letter, that, in future, he will be deemed to have received any letters which have been put up on this website, like the one above. The email address on his website, firstname.lastname@example.org, has been taken down and doesn’t work; he claims he doesn’t receive emails sent to his email address on the Sydney University’s website, email@example.com; and why should we or anyone else have to go to the trouble of setting themselves us to send faxes just for him, and why should we have to go to the trouble of sending him letters through Australia Post. And it makes it easy for him – he can respond using our email address – firstname.lastname@example.org. If he doesn’t bother to check this website for letters deemed to have sent to him, which only takes a few seconds a day, that’s his problem. And any letters any of our readers wish to send him, can be put up in the same way.